Raymond Terrell Stewart v. United States

367 F.2d 576
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 25, 1966
Docket23633
StatusPublished

This text of 367 F.2d 576 (Raymond Terrell Stewart v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raymond Terrell Stewart v. United States, 367 F.2d 576 (5th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted of transporting a stolen automobile in interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. The judgment of conviction was entered on a jury verdict of guilty. The sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal based on the insufficiency of the evidence to prove the essential elements of the alleged crime.

The record discloses an abundance of evidence from which the jury could have concluded that the vehicle in question had been stolen; that appellant transported it in interstate commerce; and that he knew the vehicle had been stolen. This was a sufficient basis for denying the motion. See Orser v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 362 F.2d 580, on proof deriving from the unexplained possession of a recently stolen automobile.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
367 F.2d 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-terrell-stewart-v-united-states-ca5-1966.