Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum v. ACME Properties LP

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 6, 2013·No. 03-13-00181-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00181-CV

Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum, Appellants

v.

ACME Properties LP, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-12-009558, HONORABLE DAVID J. PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants’ brief was originally due on July 1, 2013, but was not filed. On

July 26, 2013, this Court sent a notice to appellants informing them that their brief was overdue.

In response, appellants filed a motion for extension of time to file their brief. We granted the

motion, making the brief due August 19, 2013. However, appellants failed to file a brief by that

date. On September 25, 2013, we notified appellants that their brief was overdue and that a failure

to respond by October 7, 2013, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution.

The October 7 deadline has passed, and appellants have not filed a brief or a motion for extension

of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a);

42.3(b). __________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: November 6, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum v. ACME Properties LP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum v. ACME Properties LP (Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum v. ACME Properties LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.