Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum v. ACME Properties LP
This text of Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum v. ACME Properties LP (Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum v. ACME Properties LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-13-00181-CV
Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum, Appellants
v.
ACME Properties LP, Appellee
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-12-009558, HONORABLE DAVID J. PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants’ brief was originally due on July 1, 2013, but was not filed. On
July 26, 2013, this Court sent a notice to appellants informing them that their brief was overdue.
In response, appellants filed a motion for extension of time to file their brief. We granted the
motion, making the brief due August 19, 2013. However, appellants failed to file a brief by that
date. On September 25, 2013, we notified appellants that their brief was overdue and that a failure
to respond by October 7, 2013, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution.
The October 7 deadline has passed, and appellants have not filed a brief or a motion for extension
of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a);
42.3(b). __________________________________________
Scott K. Field, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: November 6, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum v. ACME Properties LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-tatum-and-sherri-tatum-v-acme-properties-l-texapp-2013.