Raymond Taft, Pet v. Com., CCP of Warren Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 27, 2018·No. 19 WM 2018·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

RAYMOND TAFT, : No. 19 WM 2018 :

Petitioner : : :

v. : : :

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : WARREN COUNTY, : :

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are

DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid

representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings

to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond Taft, Pet v. Com., CCP of Warren Co., (Pa. 2018).

Raymond Taft, Pet v. Com., CCP of Warren Co. (Raymond Taft, Pet v. Com., CCP of Warren Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)