Raymond Taft, Pet v. Com., CCP of Warren Co.
This text of Raymond Taft, Pet v. Com., CCP of Warren Co. (Raymond Taft, Pet v. Com., CCP of Warren Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
RAYMOND TAFT, : No. 19 WM 2018 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : WARREN COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are
DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid
representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings
to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raymond Taft, Pet v. Com., CCP of Warren Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-taft-pet-v-com-ccp-of-warren-co-pa-2018.