Raymond Swanson v. Laticea Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 26, 2012·No. 01-10-01031-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued January 26, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01B10B01031BCV

raymond swanson, Appellant

V.

laticea williams, Appellee

On Appeal from the 280th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-40981

MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant Raymond Swanson has neither established indigence, nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk=s record.  See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault).  After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(allowing involuntary dismissal).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond Swanson v. Laticea Williams, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Raymond Swanson v. Laticea Williams (Raymond Swanson v. Laticea Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.