Raymond Steffan Davis Jr. v. Shailair D. Simms
This text of Raymond Steffan Davis Jr. v. Shailair D. Simms (Raymond Steffan Davis Jr. v. Shailair D. Simms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00601-CV ___________________________
RAYMOND STEFFAN DAVIS JR., Appellant
V.
SHAILAIR D. SIMMS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360-772875-25
Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on May 1, 2026. On May 13, 2026, we notified
Appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless, by May 26, 2026, Appellant filed with the court an Appellant’s brief and an
accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an
extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have
received no response.
Because Appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam
Delivered: June 18, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raymond Steffan Davis Jr. v. Shailair D. Simms, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-steffan-davis-jr-v-shailair-d-simms-txctapp2-2026.