Raymond P. Shaw v. Officer Haga C. Simmerman Officer Lowell Department of Corrections Nurse Hylton

Fourth Circuit

Raymond P. Shaw v. Officer Haga C. Simmerman Officer Lowell Department of Corrections Nurse Hylton

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11053, 1995 WL 95838

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 9, 1995

Docket94-6991

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1217 (Raymond P. Shaw v. Officer Haga C. Simmerman Officer Lowell Department of Corrections Nurse Hylton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raymond P. Shaw v. Officer Haga C. Simmerman Officer Lowell Department of Corrections Nurse Hylton, 48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11053, 1995 WL 95838 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Raymond P. SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OFFICER HAGA; C. Simmerman; Officer Lowell; Department of
Corrections; Nurse Hylton, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6991.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 16, 1995.
Decided: March 9, 1995.

Raymond P. Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA; Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shaw v. Haga, No. CA-93-766 (W.D.Va. June 2 & Aug. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Raymond P. SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OFFICER HAGA; C. Simmerman; Officer Lowell; Department of
Corrections; Nurse Hylton, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6991.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 16, 1995.
Decided: March 9, 1995.

Raymond P. Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA; Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shaw v. Haga, No. CA-93-766 (W.D.Va. June 2 & Aug. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11053, 1995 WL 95838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-p-shaw-v-officer-haga-c-simmerman-officer--ca4-1995.