Raymond P. Shaw v. Officer Haga C. Simmerman Officer Lowell Department of Corrections Nurse Hylton

Fourth Circuit

Raymond P. Shaw v. Officer Haga C. Simmerman Officer Lowell Department of Corrections Nurse Hylton

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11053, 1995 WL 95838

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 1995·No. 94-6991·Published

Opinion

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Raymond P. SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OFFICER HAGA; C. Simmerman; Officer Lowell; Department of
Corrections; Nurse Hylton, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6991.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 16, 1995.
Decided: March 9, 1995.

Raymond P. Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA; Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shaw v. Haga, No. CA-93-766 (W.D.Va. June 2 & Aug. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Raymond P. SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OFFICER HAGA; C. Simmerman; Officer Lowell; Department of
Corrections; Nurse Hylton, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6991.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 16, 1995.
Decided: March 9, 1995.

Raymond P. Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA; Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shaw v. Haga, No. CA-93-766 (W.D.Va. June 2 & Aug. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Raymond P. Shaw v. Officer Haga C. Simmerman Officer Lowell Department of Corrections Nurse Hylton, 48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11053, 1995 WL 95838 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

48 F.3d 1217 (Raymond P. Shaw v. Officer Haga C. Simmerman Officer Lowell Department of Corrections Nurse Hylton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.