Raymond Otell Banner v. United States Parole Commission Bob Guzik
This text of 48 F.3d 1215 (Raymond Otell Banner v. United States Parole Commission Bob Guzik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Raymond Otell BANNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Bob Guzik, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-6945.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 7, 1995.
Decided March 2, 1995.
Raymond Otell Banner, Appellant pro se.
Before HALL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Banner v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. HC-94-265-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10990, 1995 WL 83639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-otell-banner-v-united-states-parole-commis-ca4-1995.