Raymond Nanez Zaragoza v. State
This text of Raymond Nanez Zaragoza v. State (Raymond Nanez Zaragoza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 14, 2008
DISMISSED
The trial court's certification in this appeal states that the case is a "plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, "[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Appellant's appellate counsel notified this court that appellant does not have a right to appeal in this case. Counsel further indicated that appellant would not file an amended trial court certification showing that he has the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant's counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raymond Nanez Zaragoza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-nanez-zaragoza-v-state-texapp-2008.