Raymond Martin Hernandez v. Constance Mae Hernandez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Raymond Martin Hernandez v. Constance Mae Hernandez

DecidedJuly 20, 2006

Docket13-06-00342-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Raymond Martin Hernandez v. Constance Mae Hernandez (Raymond Martin Hernandez v. Constance Mae Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raymond Martin Hernandez v. Constance Mae Hernandez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-06-342-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

RAYMOND MARTIN HERNANDEZ, Appellant,

v.

CONSTANCE M. HERNANDEZ, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, RAYMOND MARTIN HERNANDEZ, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 03-6124-A. Judgment in this cause was signed on January 31, 2006. A timely motion for new trial was filed on February 28, 2006. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on May 1, 2006, but was not filed until June 21, 2006.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 20^th day of July, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-06-342-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

RAYMOND MARTIN HERNANDEZ, Appellant,

v.

CONSTANCE M. HERNANDEZ, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, RAYMOND MARTIN HERNANDEZ, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 03-6124-A. Judgment in this cause was signed on January 31, 2006. A timely motion for new trial was filed on February 28, 2006. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on May 1, 2006, but was not filed until June 21, 2006.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 20^th day of July, 2006.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Raymond Martin Hernandez v. Constance Mae Hernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-martin-hernandez-v-constance-mae-hernandez-texapp-2006.