Raymond M. Hamilton v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, (Two Cases)

469 F.2d 1394
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 29, 1973·No. 71-2737·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

469 F.2d 1394

Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases).

Nos. 71-2737, 71-2844.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1973.

Sanford Svetcov, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), W. Eric Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Emil Roy Eisenhardt (argued), Lee Van Boven, of Farella, Braun & Martel, San Francisco, Cal., Michael E. Smith, Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge. Hamilton v. Craven, 350 F.Supp. 1251 (N.D.Cal.1971). We do not reach other issues raised by appellant or by appellee on the cross-appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond M. Hamilton v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, (Two Cases), 469 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir. 1973).

469 F.2d 1394 (Raymond M. Hamilton v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, (Two Cases)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related