Raymond M. Hamilton v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, (Two Cases)
This text of 469 F.2d 1394 (Raymond M. Hamilton v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, (Two Cases)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases).
Nos. 71-2737, 71-2844.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 21, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1973.
Sanford Svetcov, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), W. Eric Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Emil Roy Eisenhardt (argued), Lee Van Boven, of Farella, Braun & Martel, San Francisco, Cal., Michael E. Smith, Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge. Hamilton v. Craven, 350 F.Supp. 1251 (N.D.Cal.1971). We do not reach other issues raised by appellant or by appellee on the cross-appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 F.2d 1394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-m-hamilton-v-walter-e-craven-warden-two-cases-ca9-1973.