Raymond Lane v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Raymond Lane v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Raymond Lane v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 1, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
146258 & (9) Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack RAYMOND LANE, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff, Justices
v SC: 146258 AGC: 2186-12 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 1, 2013 _________________________________________ p0325 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raymond Lane v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-lane-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2013.