Raymond Jackson, Also Known as Najee As'ad Na'im v. Mike Cody, Attorney General of Tennessee, Michael Dutton, Warden

908 F.2d 973, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23839, 1990 WL 106799
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 1990
Docket89-6531
StatusUnpublished

This text of 908 F.2d 973 (Raymond Jackson, Also Known as Najee As'ad Na'im v. Mike Cody, Attorney General of Tennessee, Michael Dutton, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raymond Jackson, Also Known as Najee As'ad Na'im v. Mike Cody, Attorney General of Tennessee, Michael Dutton, Warden, 908 F.2d 973, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23839, 1990 WL 106799 (6th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

908 F.2d 973

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Raymond JACKSON, also known as Najee As'ad Na'im, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Mike CODY, Attorney General of Tennessee, Michael Dutton,
Warden, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-6531.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 30, 1990.

Before KRUPANSKY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant has not responded.

It appears from the record that the district court entered an order on November 15, 1989, rescinding a September 25, 1989, memorandum and request to review the performance of appellant's counsel, and to provide the court with an opinion. This order was entered after the order dismissing appellant's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition. The appellant appealed from the November 15, 1989, order.

Upon review we conclude that this order entered on November 15, 1989, concerns an administrative matter initiated and terminated by the district court which is therefore not a final, appealable order within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. Cf. In re Rini, 782 F.2d 603, 607 (6th Cir.1986). As such, the petitioner likewise lacks standing to appeal the order as it was simply not entered on the merits of his case. Cf. Bender v. Williamsport Area School Dist., 475 U.S. 534, 541-43 (1986).

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby granted. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
908 F.2d 973, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23839, 1990 WL 106799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-jackson-also-known-as-najee-asad-naim-v-mike-cody-attorney-ca6-1990.