Raymond H. Greenhaw v. Kemp Independent School District

Court of Appeals of Texas

Raymond H. Greenhaw v. Kemp Independent School District

DecidedJanuary 25, 2006

Docket12-05-00416-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Raymond H. Greenhaw v. Kemp Independent School District (Raymond H. Greenhaw v. Kemp Independent School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raymond H. Greenhaw v. Kemp Independent School District, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

MARY'S OPINION HEADING

NO. 12-05-00416-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RAYMOND HOLLIS GREENHAW, § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

KEMP INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in the instant case was signed on November 14, 2005. Thereafter, Appellant filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Rule 25.1 (e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court’s judgment. On December 22, 2005, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rule 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed an amended notice of appeal on or before January 23, 2006, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. However, Appellant has not responded to the December 22 notice or amended his notice of appeal to correct the defect.

Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to correct his defective notice of appeal, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04-0004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.–Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, 12-03-00442-CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.–Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied).

Opinion delivered January 25, 2006.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARY'S OPINION HEADING

NO. 12-05-00416-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RAYMOND HOLLIS GREENHAW, § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

KEMP INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in the instant case was signed on November 14, 2005. Thereafter, Appellant filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Rule 25.1 (e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court’s judgment. On December 22, 2005, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rule 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed an amended notice of appeal on or before January 23, 2006, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. However, Appellant has not responded to the December 22 notice or amended his notice of appeal to correct the defect.

Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to correct his defective notice of appeal, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04-0004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.–Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, 12-03-00442-CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.–Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied).

Opinion delivered January 25, 2006.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Raymond H. Greenhaw v. Kemp Independent School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-h-greenhaw-v-kemp-independent-school-distr-texapp-2006.