Raymond Gearhart v. Juan Castillo

560 F. App'x 622
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 11, 2014·No. 13-2123·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Gearhart appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). As to the claims he raised in his amended complaint concerning the forced administration of medications, 2 we find no basis for reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment, and Gearhart has identified none. See Green v. Dormire, 691 F.3d 917, 921 (8th Cir.2012) (de novo review). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. Gearhart has abandoned his other claims. See Roers v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 728 F.3d 832, 838 (8th Cir.2013).

1

. The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond Gearhart v. Juan Castillo, 560 F. App'x 622 (8th Cir. 2014).

560 F. App'x 622 (Raymond Gearhart v. Juan Castillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Timothy Green v. Dave Dormire
691 F.3d 917 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Cynthia Roers v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
728 F.3d 832 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)