Raymond G. v. Colette E.

3 A.D.3d 461, 770 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 906

This text of 3 A.D.3d 461 (Raymond G. v. Colette E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raymond G. v. Colette E., 3 A.D.3d 461, 770 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Richard Ross, J.), entered on or about June 17, 1999, which granted petitioner’s application for custody of the subject child, with supervised visits by respondent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The award of custody in favor of petitioner is amply supported by evidence that, inter alia, respondent interfered with petitioner’s visitation rights (see Matter of Michael C., 282 AD2d 407 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 722 [2001]) and resides with a boyfriend who has an extensive criminal history that includes drug-related convictions (cf. Matter of Joseph Emmanuel N., 292 [462]*462AD2d 295 [2002]), and that petitioner is better able to provide for the child’s emotional, intellectual and other needs, including a nurturing home and family (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 172, 173 [1982]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eschbach v. Eschbach
436 N.E.2d 1260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
In re Michael C.
282 A.D.2d 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re Joseph Emmanuel N.
292 A.D.2d 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A.D.3d 461, 770 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-g-v-colette-e-nyappdiv-2004.