Raymond F. Duckworth v. Rae E. Helms, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles W. Easterday, Deceased

268 F.2d 584
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 12, 1959
Docket14881_1
StatusPublished

This text of 268 F.2d 584 (Raymond F. Duckworth v. Rae E. Helms, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles W. Easterday, Deceased) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raymond F. Duckworth v. Rae E. Helms, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles W. Easterday, Deceased, 268 F.2d 584 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After our decision in Helms v. Duck-worth, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 390, 249 F.2d 482, 1 the case went back for trial. The District Court, sitting as a court of equity, heard evidence adduced by both parties, and rendered judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant appeals. We think that the trial court correctly interpreted our decision in the earlier appeal, and that no error occurred affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

1

. Annotated in 72 Harv.L.Rev. 555 (1959); 1171 (1958). 36 Tex.L.Rev. 829 (1958); 106 U.Pa.L.Rev.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 F.2d 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-f-duckworth-v-rae-e-helms-administratrix-of-the-estate-of-cadc-1959.