Raymond Ellis Newsome v. State
This text of Raymond Ellis Newsome v. State (Raymond Ellis Newsome v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered June 8, 2018
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00176-CR
RAYMOND ELLIS NEWSOME, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-20384-W
ORDER When appellant did not provide us with written verification that he had paid or made
arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without the
reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3. We then ordered appellant’s brief filed by April 28,
2018. When the brief was not filed, we notified appellant by postcard dated May 2, 2018 and
directed him to file a brief along with a motion to extend time to file the brief by May 12, 2018.
To date, no brief has been filed and we have had no correspondence from appellant.
Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s
brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal or whether
appellant has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s
absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per
curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be
necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to Judge Tracy Holmes, Presiding
Judge, 363rd Judicial District Court; to retained counsel Scottie Allen; and to the Dallas County
District Attorney.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raymond Ellis Newsome v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-ellis-newsome-v-state-tex-2018.