Raymond Ellis Newsome v. State

Texas Supreme Court·Decided June 8, 2018·No. 05-18-00176-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered June 8, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00176-CR

RAYMOND ELLIS NEWSOME, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-20384-W

ORDER

When appellant did not provide us with written verification that he had paid or made

arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3. We then ordered appellant’s brief filed by April 28, 2018. When the brief was not filed, we notified appellant by postcard dated May 2, 2018 and directed him to file a brief along with a motion to extend time to file the brief by May 12, 2018. To date, no brief has been filed and we have had no correspondence from appellant.

Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal or whether appellant has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to Judge Tracy Holmes, Presiding Judge, 363rd Judicial District Court; to retained counsel Scottie Allen; and to the Dallas County District Attorney.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond Ellis Newsome v. State, (Tex. 2018).

Raymond Ellis Newsome v. State (Raymond Ellis Newsome v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)