Raymond Curtis v. E. P. Perini, Supt. Marion Correctional Institution

Sixth Circuit

Raymond Curtis v. E. P. Perini, Supt. Marion Correctional Institution

413 F.2d 546, 50 Ohio Op. 2d 262, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11831

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1969

Docket19235_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 413 F.2d 546 (Raymond Curtis v. E. P. Perini, Supt. Marion Correctional Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raymond Curtis v. E. P. Perini, Supt. Marion Correctional Institution, 413 F.2d 546, 50 Ohio Op. 2d 262, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11831 (6th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This cause is before the Court upon an appeal by Raymond Curtis, petitioner-appellant, from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Upon consideration we find no merit to any of the claims for relief advanced by the appellant and we find that the district judge adequately considered each of appellant’s claims and correctly determined that the petition should be dismissed.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Young reported at 301 F. Supp. 444.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This cause is before the Court upon an appeal by Raymond Curtis, petitioner-appellant, from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Upon consideration we find no merit to any of the claims for relief advanced by the appellant and we find that the district judge adequately considered each of appellant’s claims and correctly determined that the petition should be dismissed.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Young reported at 301 F. Supp. 444.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

413 F.2d 546, 50 Ohio Op. 2d 262, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-curtis-v-e-p-perini-supt-marion-correctional-institution-ca6-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack