Raymond Cook v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Raymond Cook v. United States

461 F.2d 775, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10120

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 12, 1972

Docket71-2413

StatusPublished

This text of 461 F.2d 775 (Raymond Cook v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raymond Cook v. United States, 461 F.2d 775, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10120 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The final judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court for expeditious reconsideration in light of the principles announced in Vaccaro v. United States, 5 Cir., 1972, 461 F.2d 626 [1972]; Leary v. United States, 1969, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57; and Harrington v. United States, 5 Cir., 1971, 444 F.2d 1190. 1

Vacated and remanded.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of tins case summarily. See Groendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F.2d 1158.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The final judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court for expeditious reconsideration in light of the principles announced in Vaccaro v. United States, 5 Cir., 1972, 461 F.2d 626 [1972]; Leary v. United States, 1969, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57; and Harrington v. United States, 5 Cir., 1971, 444 F.2d 1190. 1

Vacated and remanded.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of tins case summarily. See Groendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F.2d 1158.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

461 F.2d 775, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-cook-v-united-states-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack