Raymond Bright v. State of Florida

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida THURSDAY, AUGUST 13, 2020

CASE NO.: SC17-2244 Lower Tribunal No(s).: 162008CF002887AXXXMA

RAYMOND BRIGHT vs. STATE OF FLORIDA

Appellant(s) Appellee(s)

Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LAWSON, and MUÑIZ, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion. COURIEL, J., did not participate.

LABARGA, J., concurring.

Because Bright’s motion for rehearing reargues issues already addressed and

does not raise any points of law or fact that this Court has overlooked or

misapprehended, I must concur with the majority to deny the motion for rehearing.

However, I remain firmly committed to my dissent in State v. Poole, 45 Fla. L.

Weekly S41, S51-52 (Fla. Jan. 23, 2020) (Labarga, J. dissenting), clarified, 45 Fla.

L. Weekly S121 (Fla. Apr. 2, 2020), and to my position that the opinion was

wrongly decided. CASE NO.: SC17-2244 Page Two

A True Copy Test:

so Served:

CHARMAINE M. MILLSAPS A. VICTORIA WIGGINS JASON W. RODRIGUEZ HON. RONNIE FUSSELL HON. MARK H. MAHON HON. RUSSELL L. HEALEY BERNARDO ENRIQUE DE LA RIONDA