Raymond Bright v. State of Florida

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida

THURSDAY, AUGUST 13, 2020

CASE NO.: SC17-2244

Lower Tribunal No(s).:

162008CF002887AXXXMA

RAYMOND BRIGHT vs. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellant(s) Appellee(s)

Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LAWSON, and MUÑIZ, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion. COURIEL, J., did not participate.

LABARGA, J., concurring.

Because Bright’s motion for rehearing reargues issues already addressed and does not raise any points of law or fact that this Court has overlooked or misapprehended, I must concur with the majority to deny the motion for rehearing. However, I remain firmly committed to my dissent in State v. Poole, 45 Fla. L. Weekly S41, S51-52 (Fla. Jan. 23, 2020) (Labarga, J. dissenting), clarified, 45 Fla. L. Weekly S121 (Fla. Apr. 2, 2020), and to my position that the opinion was wrongly decided.

CASE NO.: SC17-2244 Page Two

A True Copy Test:

so Served:

CHARMAINE M. MILLSAPS A. VICTORIA WIGGINS JASON W. RODRIGUEZ HON. RONNIE FUSSELL HON. MARK H. MAHON HON. RUSSELL L. HEALEY BERNARDO ENRIQUE DE LA RIONDA