Raymond Bag Co. v. Bowers

163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 275
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 1955·No. No. 34242·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Appellant contends that the Ohio franchise tax statutes, Section 5495 el seq., General Code (Section 5733.01 et seq., Revised Code), as construed and applied herein by the commissi oner, impose a direct tax upon United States securities and interest thereon contrary to Section 742, Title 31, U. S. Code, and Section 8, Article I of the United States Constitution.

The judgment of this court in the case of Fifth Third Union Trust Co. v. Peck, Tax Commr., 161 Ohio St., 169, 118 N. E. (2d), 398, is dispositive of the issues here presented. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed on authority of that case.

Decision affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Bell and Taft, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond Bag Co. v. Bowers, 163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 275 (Ohio 1955).

163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 275 (Raymond Bag Co. v. Bowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Trust Co. v. Lander
184 U.S. 111 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Des Moines National Bank v. Fairweather
263 U.S. 103 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Schuylkill Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania
296 U.S. 113 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. City of Omaha
103 N.W. 84 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1905)