Raymond B. Grams v. Carol Grams

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 10, 1999
Docket04-98-00735-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Raymond B. Grams v. Carol Grams (Raymond B. Grams v. Carol Grams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raymond B. Grams v. Carol Grams, (Tex. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

No. 04-98-00735-CV


Raymond B. GRAMS,
Appellant


v.


Carole GRAMS,
Appellee


From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 96-CI-10675
Honorable Carolyn Spears-Peterson, Judge Presiding


Per Curiam Opinion

Sitting: Paul W. Green, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and filed: February 10, 1999

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Because it appeared that appellant had abandoned this appeal by failing to file a clerk's record, we ordered him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant did not respond. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

Return to
Fourth Court of Appeals

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Raymond B. Grams v. Carol Grams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-b-grams-v-carol-grams-texapp-1999.