Raymond B. Grams v. Carol Grams
This text of Raymond B. Grams v. Carol Grams (Raymond B. Grams v. Carol Grams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Per Curiam Opinion
Sitting: Paul W. Green, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and filed: February 10, 1999
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
Because it appeared that appellant had abandoned this appeal by failing to file a clerk's record, we ordered him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant did not respond. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Return to
Fourth Court of Appeals
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raymond B. Grams v. Carol Grams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-b-grams-v-carol-grams-texapp-1999.