Rayford L. Burke v. Michael Grant Howard Brown Ken Shawver Robert Warsaw Ralph Bently

Fourth Circuit

Rayford L. Burke v. Michael Grant Howard Brown Ken Shawver Robert Warsaw Ralph Bently

52 F.3d 320, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17204, 1995 WL 231831

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 20, 1995

Docket94-7236

StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 320 (Rayford L. Burke v. Michael Grant Howard Brown Ken Shawver Robert Warsaw Ralph Bently) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rayford L. Burke v. Michael Grant Howard Brown Ken Shawver Robert Warsaw Ralph Bently, 52 F.3d 320, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17204, 1995 WL 231831 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

52 F.3d 320
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rayford L. BURKE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Michael GRANT; Howard Brown; Ken Shawver; Robert Warsaw;
Ralph Bently, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7236.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 1995.
Decided April 20, 1995.

Rayford L. Burke, Appellant Pro Se.

Edmund L. Gaines, HOMESLEY, JONES, GAINES & FIELDS, Statesville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burke v. Grant, No. CA-92-39-5-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

52 F.3d 320
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rayford L. BURKE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Michael GRANT; Howard Brown; Ken Shawver; Robert Warsaw;
Ralph Bently, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7236.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 1995.
Decided April 20, 1995.

Rayford L. Burke, Appellant Pro Se.

Edmund L. Gaines, HOMESLEY, JONES, GAINES & FIELDS, Statesville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burke v. Grant, No. CA-92-39-5-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 F.3d 320, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17204, 1995 WL 231831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rayford-l-burke-v-michael-grant-howard-brown-ken-s-ca4-1995.