Rayex Corp. v. Sanchez

New York Supreme Court

Rayex Corp. v. Sanchez

11 Misc. 2d 261, 171 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1307

New York Supreme Court·Decided December 10, 1956·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cortland A. Johnson, J.

Plaintiffs’ motion for temporary injunction granted.

A formal contract exists between plaintiffs and another union, with no-strike and arbitration provisions. If plaintiffs’ employees are dissatisfied with their present union representation they should get rid of the contract by legal means; but while that contract is in effect, they have no right to break it; and the defendants have no right to induce or aid in its breach. Ample machinery exists for the consideration of the employees’ grievances, and they should make use of it.

The bond already furnished may be continued.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cortland A. Johnson, J.

Plaintiffs’ motion for temporary injunction granted.

A formal contract exists between plaintiffs and another union, with no-strike and arbitration provisions. If plaintiffs’ employees are dissatisfied with their present union representation they should get rid of the contract by legal means; but while that contract is in effect, they have no right to break it; and the defendants have no right to induce or aid in its breach. Ample machinery exists for the consideration of the employees’ grievances, and they should make use of it.

The bond already furnished may be continued.

Settle order on notice.

Rayex Corp. v. Sanchez, 11 Misc. 2d 261, 171 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1307 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1956).

Pincite

11 Misc. 2d 261 (Rayex Corp. v. Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related