Rayess v. Bitar
This text of Rayess v. Bitar (Rayess v. Bitar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
MAYADA RAYESS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-1894
JOSEPH BITAR,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed October 19, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Alicia L. Latimore, Judge.
Mayada Rayess, Orlando, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The former wife, Mayada Rayess, appeals the final judgment dissolving her
marriage to the former husband, Joseph Bitar. Because we do not have a transcript of
the proceedings below, we cannot address the former wife’s contention that the trial
court’s decision on the issues of alimony and equitable distribution are without evidentiary
support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.
1979). Thus, we must affirm unless the former wife can demonstrate that “fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order.” Murphy v. Murphy, 948 So. 2d 864,
865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). The former wife has made no such showing in this case.
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, TORPY and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rayess v. Bitar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rayess-v-bitar-fladistctapp-2018.