Rayess v. Bitar

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rayess v. Bitar

254 So. 3d 1197

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 2018·No. Case No. 5D18-1894·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former wife, Mayada Rayess, appeals the final judgment dissolving her marriage to the former husband, Joseph Bitar. Because we do not have a transcript of the proceedings below, we cannot address the former wife's contention that the trial court's decision on the issues of alimony and equitable distribution are without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). Thus, we must affirm unless the former wife can demonstrate that "fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order." Murphy v. Murphy, 948 So.2d 864, 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). The former wife has made no such showing in this case.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The former wife, Mayada Rayess, appeals the final judgment dissolving her marriage to the former husband, Joseph Bitar. Because we do not have a transcript of the proceedings below, we cannot address the former wife's contention that the trial court's decision on the issues of alimony and equitable distribution are without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). Thus, we must affirm unless the former wife can demonstrate that "fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order." Murphy v. Murphy, 948 So.2d 864, 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). The former wife has made no such showing in this case.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Rayess v. Bitar, 254 So. 3d 1197 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

254 So. 3d 1197 (Rayess v. Bitar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related