Raydo v. State
748 So. 2d 1037, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11511, 1998 WL 597852
Opinion
Appellant challenged his robbery conviction on three grounds, one of which this Court found warranted a new trial. Raydo v. State, 696 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The supreme court quashed that opinion in part, approved it in part and reversed the’decision to grant a new trial, [1038] State v. Raydo, 713 So.2d 996 (Fla.1998), but did not address the other issues appellant had initially raised. Having found no merit in appellant’s other claims, we hereby affirm the judgment and sentence below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raydo v. State, 748 So. 2d 1037, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11511, 1998 WL 597852 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
748 So. 2d 1037 (Raydo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Raydo v. State
696 So. 2d 1225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
State v. Raydo
713 So. 2d 996 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)