Rayco Bronx, Inc. v. Rayco Mfg. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rayco Bronx, Inc. v. Rayco Mfg. Co.

25 A.D.2d 738, 269 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4434

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 738 (Rayco Bronx, Inc. v. Rayco Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rayco Bronx, Inc. v. Rayco Mfg. Co., 25 A.D.2d 738, 269 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4434 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered March 1, 1966, unanimously modified to the extent of directing that the complaint be made more definite and certain and as so modified is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. While it may well be that the defendant can answer the complaint, a better pleading consisting of a plain and concise statement would be in the best interest of the parties to clearly present the issues at a trial. (Foley v. D’Agostino, 21 A D 2d 60, 64; CPLR 3014, 3024; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, par. 3024.05, pp. 30-401, 30-402.)

Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered March 1, 1966, unanimously modified to the extent of directing that the complaint be made more definite and certain and as so modified is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. While it may well be that the defendant can answer the complaint, a better pleading consisting of a plain and concise statement would be in the best interest of the parties to clearly present the issues at a trial. (Foley v. D’Agostino, 21 A D 2d 60, 64; CPLR 3014, 3024; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, par. 3024.05, pp. 30-401, 30-402.)

Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 738, 269 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rayco-bronx-inc-v-rayco-mfg-co-nyappdiv-1966.