Rayburn v. Richardson

309 U.S. 632, 60 S. Ct. 718
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 25, 1940
DocketNo. 781
StatusPublished

This text of 309 U.S. 632 (Rayburn v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rayburn v. Richardson, 309 U.S. 632, 60 S. Ct. 718 (1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Hendrick v. Maryland, 235 U. S. 610; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U. S. 374, 388-389; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 173.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hendrick v. Maryland
235 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Sproles v. Binford
286 U.S. 374 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Hicklin v. Coney
290 U.S. 169 (Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 U.S. 632, 60 S. Ct. 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rayburn-v-richardson-scotus-1940.