Rayam v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
This text of 347 So. 2d 842 (Rayam v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully read the record which reflects that the learned trial judge properly and repeatedly admonished counsel for both parties to refrain from the use of leading questions. Although one dissertation as to the reason for leading questions being impermissible might better have been delivered out of the presence of the jury, the language employed by the judge was mild and not couched in such terms as to have prejudiced either party, thus distinguishing Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. Wiesenfeld Warehouse Company, 316 So.2d 567 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) and Giglio v. Valdez, 114 So.2d 305 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1959). Accordingly, appellant having failed to demonstrate error, the judgment here appealed is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
347 So. 2d 842, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rayam-v-greyhound-lines-inc-fladistctapp-1977.