Ray Walker & Associates v. Jay Caponey, Inc.

320 So. 2d 13
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 1975
DocketNo. 75-889
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 320 So. 2d 13 (Ray Walker & Associates v. Jay Caponey, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray Walker & Associates v. Jay Caponey, Inc., 320 So. 2d 13 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

OWEN, Judge.

Defendant, a foreign insurance agency, was served with process under the provisions of Fla.Stat. § 48.193(1) (1973). This interlocutory appeal is from an order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person.

Defendant delivered to the plaintiff in Florida on March 22, 1973 a policy of insurance issued by Lloyd’s of London on February 3, 1973. On August 19, 1973 certain property covered by the policy was stolen. When plaintiff attempted to collect under the policy for the loss, it was discovered that the policy did not provide coverage for theft. The complaint alleged that the defendant had breached its warranty and representation as to the coverage it could provide and had negligently failed to provide the proper policy, as a result of which conduct plaintiff had sustained monetary loss.

Though plaintiff’s loss did not occur until August 19, 1973, its cause of action accrued at the time defendant delivered the insurance policy on March 22, 1973. This date is prior to the effective date of Fla. Stat. § 48.193(1) (1973) under which statute plaintiff sought to perfect the service of process. The courts have held that this and similar statutes providing for constructive service may not be applied retroactively to causes of action which accrued prior to their effective dates. See, Gordon v. John Deere Company, 264 So.2d 419 (Fla.1972); Barton v. Keyes Company, 305 So. 2d 269 (3rd DCA Fla.1974); Marshall v. Johnson, 301 So.2d 134 (1st DCA Fla.1974).

The order appealed is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Motors Corp. v. Abrahantes
474 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
320 So. 2d 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-walker-associates-v-jay-caponey-inc-fladistctapp-1975.