Ray v. Warner Sugar Refining Co.

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Ray v. Warner Sugar Refining Co.

4 N.J. Misc. 734

CourtNew Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

DecidedJuly 1, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.J. Misc. 734 (Ray v. Warner Sugar Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray v. Warner Sugar Refining Co., 4 N.J. Misc. 734 (N.J. Super. Ct. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

This case come up for hearing on the motion of the respondent to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.

The facts being admitted that the petitioner suffered an injury while on board the lighter “Alexander Lee,” on navigable waters, I find that the workmen’s compensation bureau of New Jersey is without jurisdiction, as this is a matter that comes under admiralty jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the motion of the respondent is granted and the case dismissed without cost to either party.

Charles E. Corbin,

Deputy Commissioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case come up for hearing on the motion of the respondent to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.

The facts being admitted that the petitioner suffered an injury while on board the lighter “Alexander Lee,” on navigable waters, I find that the workmen’s compensation bureau of New Jersey is without jurisdiction, as this is a matter that comes under admiralty jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the motion of the respondent is granted and the case dismissed without cost to either party.

Charles E. Corbin,

Deputy Commissioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 N.J. Misc. 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-warner-sugar-refining-co-njlaborcomp-1926.