Ray v. The New 42nd Street, Inc.

S.D. New York

Ray v. The New 42nd Street, Inc.

DecidedJuly 6, 2023

Docket1:22-cv-04811

StatusUnknown

This text of Ray v. The New 42nd Street, Inc. (Ray v. The New 42nd Street, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray v. The New 42nd Street, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK re nr nr nn re nn se ene eee cwesnen- X KEVIN RAY, : : ORDER Plaintiff, : -against- : 22 Civ. 4811 (AKH) THE NEW 42nd STREET, INC., : Defendant. :

ea ee a we ee ee ee wre ee ee x ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: I have reviewed the parties’ letter (ECF No. 26) moving to seal the Affidavit of Kevin Ray (ECF No. 22) and two records filed as exhibits thereto. Although the parties have consented to treating that material as “attorneys eyes only” material under their confidentiality stipulation, the letter does not describe any “‘extraordinary circumstance or compelling need’ to seal the documents from public inspection.” Bernsten v. O'Reilly, 307 F. Supp. 3d 161, 165 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting Video Software Dealers Ass'n v. Orion Pictures, 2\ F.3d 24, 27 (2d Cir. 1994)). Because the parties have not demonstrated good cause to support sealing the records at issue, the consent motion to seal is denied. Plaintiff is instructed to file publicly the records at issue. The Clerk shall terminate ECF No. 26.

SO ORDERED. Cr □□□ ~ Dated: July 6, 2023 New York, New York So ALVIN K, HELLERSTEIN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK re nr nr nn re nn se ene eee cwesnen- X KEVIN RAY, : : ORDER Plaintiff, : -against- : 22 Civ. 4811 (AKH) THE NEW 42nd STREET, INC., : Defendant. :

ea ee a we ee ee ee wre ee ee x ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: I have reviewed the parties’ letter (ECF No. 26) moving to seal the Affidavit of Kevin Ray (ECF No. 22) and two records filed as exhibits thereto. Although the parties have consented to treating that material as “attorneys eyes only” material under their confidentiality stipulation, the letter does not describe any “‘extraordinary circumstance or compelling need’ to seal the documents from public inspection.” Bernsten v. O'Reilly, 307 F. Supp. 3d 161, 165 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting Video Software Dealers Ass'n v. Orion Pictures, 2\ F.3d 24, 27 (2d Cir. 1994)). Because the parties have not demonstrated good cause to support sealing the records at issue, the consent motion to seal is denied. Plaintiff is instructed to file publicly the records at issue. The Clerk shall terminate ECF No. 26.

SO ORDERED. Cr □□□ ~ Dated: July 6, 2023 New York, New York So ALVIN K, HELLERSTEIN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ray v. The New 42nd Street, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-the-new-42nd-street-inc-nysd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack