Ray v. The Bark Henry Harbeck

1 Cal. 451
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Cal. 451 (Ray v. The Bark Henry Harbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray v. The Bark Henry Harbeck, 1 Cal. 451 (Cal. 1851).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bennett, J.

Tbe Henry Harbech was not a vessel used in navigating the waters of this state, within the meaning of the act known as the Boat and Tessel Act. The case falls directly within the decision of this court in the case of the Sea Witch. The vessel was used in navigating the high seas, and not the waters of this state, any farther than by entering the harbor of San Francisco from the ocean. It was held [452]*452in the case of the Sea Witch that an attachment could not issue against such a vessel. The judgment must be reversed.

Note,—At the same term of the court, the case of the Sea Witch was also affirmed in the case of Morey v. The Ship Andalusia,

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brookfield v. Drury College
123 S.W. 86 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-the-bark-henry-harbeck-cal-1851.