Ray v. State

433 S.W.2d 434, 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1081
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 6, 1968·No. No. 41714·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

DICE, Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully transporting wine in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The complaint, drawn under Arts. 666-3a(4) and 666-17(13), Vernon’s Ann.P.C., charged appellant with unlawfully transporting an illicit beverage, to-wit: wine, in a container to which no tax stamp showing payment of the tax due thereon to the state was affixed, while the information, drawn under Art. 666-4(b), P.C., charged appellant with unlawfully transporting an alcoholic beverage, to-wit: wine, in a dry area.

It is apparent that the complaint and the information do not charge the same offense. Such variance is fatal to the information and the conviction cannot stand. See: 30 Tex.Jur.2d 550, et seq., Sec. 12, Indictment and Information. Harden v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 84, 136 S.W. 768.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State, 433 S.W.2d 434, 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1081 (Tex. 1968).

433 S.W.2d 434 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamori Nicole Henry v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019