Ray v. State

100 S.W.2d 361, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 727
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 6, 1937
DocketNo. 18697
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.W.2d 361 (Ray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray v. State, 100 S.W.2d 361, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 727 (Tex. 1937).

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated assault, and his punishment [362]*362was ass'essed at confinement in the county-jail for a term of nine months and a fine of $300.

The record before us is without a statement of facts or bills of exception. There are, however, a number of objections to the court’s charge, but, in the absence of a statement of facts, we cannot properly appraise the same. The indictment seems to be regular and in due form. Hence no reversible error is perceived.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

MORROW, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.W.2d 361, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.