Ray v. State

207 S.W. 990, 84 Tex. Crim. 262, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 374
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 20, 1918·No. No. 5203.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder, the jury assessing his punishment at twenty-five years in the penitentiary.

This is a fact case, without hills of exception either to the introduction or rejection of testimony, or to the charges of the court. The evidence is fully sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. Appellant’s theory of his case was self-defense. The jury, however, disregarded his view of it and found him guilty. We deem it unnecessary to review the facts. They would be of no practical utility to the bar and bench, and, therefore, the facts are not collated.

The judgment will he affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State, 207 S.W. 990, 84 Tex. Crim. 262, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 374 (Tex. 1918).

207 S.W. 990 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ryan v. State
55 S.W.2d 829 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Smith v. State
40 S.W.2d 154 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)