Ray v. State
261 S.W.3d 582, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 933, 2008 WL 2414842
Opinion
ORDER
Billy J. Ray appeals the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ray v. State, 261 S.W.3d 582, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 933, 2008 WL 2414842 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
261 S.W.3d 582 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campbell v. Campbell
261 S.W.3d 582 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)