Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Ray v. State

Ray v. State

126 S.E. 916, 33 Ga. App. 560, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 591
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1925·No. 16070·Published

Opinion

Bloodwobth, J.

The motion for a new trial is based upon the general grounds; the verdict is approved' by the trial judge, and this court can not say that there is no evidence to support it. See Yonce v. State, Morgan v. State, 154 Ga. 419 (114 S. E. 325); 29 Ga. App. 173 (114 S. E. 584).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State, 126 S.E. 916, 33 Ga. App. 560, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 591 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

126 S.E. 916 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yonce v. State
114 S.E. 325 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Yonce v. State
114 S.E. 584 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)