Ray v. State
126 S.E. 916, 33 Ga. App. 560, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 591
This text of 126 S.E. 916 (Ray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ray v. State, 126 S.E. 916, 33 Ga. App. 560, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 591 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
The motion for a new trial is based upon the general grounds; the verdict is approved' by the trial judge, and this court can not say that there is no evidence to support it. See Yonce v. State, Morgan v. State, 154 Ga. 419 (114 S. E. 325); 29 Ga. App. 173 (114 S. E. 584).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Yonce v. State
114 S.E. 325 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Yonce v. State
114 S.E. 584 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 916, 33 Ga. App. 560, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-state-gactapp-1925.