Ray v. State
This text of 48 S.E. 903 (Ray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where an indictment for burglary charges that the breaking and entering of the dwelling-house was with intent to commit a larceny, and the larceny is particularly set out, there may be a conviction of larceny from the house. Polite v. State, 78 Ga. 347.
2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial, predicated on the grounds that his conviction was contrary to law and evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 S.E. 903, 121 Ga. 189, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-state-ga-1904.