Ray v. State

48 S.E. 903, 121 Ga. 189, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 79
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1904·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Evans, J.

1. Where an indictment for burglary charges that the breaking and entering of the dwelling-house was with intent to commit a larceny, and the larceny is particularly set out, there may be a conviction of larceny from the house. Polite v. State, 78 Ga. 347.

2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial, predicated on the grounds that his conviction was contrary to law and evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State, 48 S.E. 903, 121 Ga. 189, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 79 (Ga. 1904).

48 S.E. 903 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Millwood v. State
132 S.E.2d 808 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Thomas v. State
88 S.E. 917 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)