Ray v. State

175 So. 3d 934, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14987, 2015 WL 5883720
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9098
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 2015·No. No. 5D12-4525·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court, which quashed our earlier decision reported at Ray v. State, 140 So.3d 702 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). See Ray v. State, 177 So.3d 1270, 2015 WL 5178595 (Sept.2015). In accordance with the Court’s ruling, we withdraw our mandate issued on June 13, 2014, and remand this matter to the trial court for re-sentencing in conformance with the framework established in chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, which has been codified in sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402 of the Florida Statutes, as explained in Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393, 395 (Fla.2015).

REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State, 175 So. 3d 934, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14987, 2015 WL 5883720 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

175 So. 3d 934 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Florida v. Anthony Duwayne Horsley, Jr.
160 So. 3d 393 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)
Ray v. State
140 So. 3d 702 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)