Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ray v. State

Ray v. State

175 So. 3d 934, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14987, 2015 WL 5883720
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 9, 2015
DocketNo. 5D12-4525
StatusPublished

This text of 175 So. 3d 934 (Ray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray v. State, 175 So. 3d 934, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14987, 2015 WL 5883720 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court, which quashed our earlier decision reported at Ray v. State, 140 So.3d 702 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). See Ray v. State, 177 So.3d 1270, 2015 WL 5178595 (Sept.2015). In accordance with the Court’s ruling, we withdraw our mandate issued on June 13, 2014, and remand this matter to the trial court for re-sentencing in conformance with the framework established in chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, which has been codified in sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402 of the Florida Statutes, as explained in Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393, 395 (Fla.2015).

REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Florida v. Anthony Duwayne Horsley, Jr.
160 So. 3d 393 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)
Ray v. State
140 So. 3d 702 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 So. 3d 934, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14987, 2015 WL 5883720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.