Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

589 A.2d 975, 322 Md. 751, 1991 Md. LEXIS 94
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 14, 1991
DocketNo. 23
StatusPublished

This text of 589 A.2d 975 (Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 589 A.2d 975, 322 Md. 751, 1991 Md. LEXIS 94 (Md. 1991).

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 14th day of May, 1991

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, reversed, and the case remanded to the Court of Special Appeals with directions to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and remand the case to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s opinion in Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co., 322 Md. 689, 589 A.2d 944 (1991). Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by the Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance
589 A.2d 944 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
589 A.2d 975, 322 Md. 751, 1991 Md. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-md-1991.