Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

589 A.2d 975, 322 Md. 751, 1991 Md. LEXIS 94
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 14, 1991·No. No. 23·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 14th day of May, 1991

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, reversed, and the case remanded to the Court of Special Appeals with directions to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and remand the case to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s opinion in Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co., 322 Md. 689, 589 A.2d 944 (1991). Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by the Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 589 A.2d 975, 322 Md. 751, 1991 Md. LEXIS 94 (Md. 1991).

589 A.2d 975 (Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance
589 A.2d 944 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1991)