Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
This text of 155 So. 2d 763 (Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to that of Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company el al., 152 So.2d 566.
Involved is a claim for hospital and medical expenses incurred in the treatment of Mrs. Ray for the injuries sustained in the accident referred to in the companion case, as well as a claim for compensation for property damage to plaintiff’s automobile. Having concluded that plaintiff’s negligence was a contributing factor in the occurrence of the accident, he is barred from recovery because of contributory negligence.
The judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demands should be, and it is hereby, affirmed at plaintiff-appellant’s cost.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 So. 2d 763, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-lactapp-1963.