Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

155 So. 2d 763, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1884
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 1, 1963·No. No. 9911·Published

Opinion

AYRES, Judge.

This is a companion case to that of Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company el al., 152 So.2d 566.

Involved is a claim for hospital and medical expenses incurred in the treatment of Mrs. Ray for the injuries sustained in the accident referred to in the companion case, as well as a claim for compensation for property damage to plaintiff’s automobile. Having concluded that plaintiff’s negligence was a contributing factor in the occurrence of the accident, he is barred from recovery because of contributory negligence.

The judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demands should be, and it is hereby, affirmed at plaintiff-appellant’s cost.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 155 So. 2d 763, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1884 (La. Ct. App. 1963).

155 So. 2d 763 (Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
152 So. 2d 566 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)