Ray v. State

73 S.W.3d 594, 348 Ark. 304, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 201
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided April 18, 2002·No. CR 02-317·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Timothy Ray, by and through his attorney, Herbert T. Wright, has filed a motion for belated appeal, which will be treated as a motion for rule on the clerk. See Johnson v. State, 342 Ark. 709, 30 S.W.3d 715 (2000) (citing Muhammed v. State, 330 Ark. 759, 957 S.W.2d 692 (1997)). Mr. Wright admits in the instant motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we grant the motion for rule on the clerk. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State, 73 S.W.3d 594, 348 Ark. 304, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 201 (Ark. 2002).

73 S.W.3d 594 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Venis v. State
84 S.W.3d 867 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2002)