Ray v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ray v. State

84 So. 926, 17 Ala. App. 696

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 16, 1919

Docket6 Div. 590.

StatusPublished

This text of 84 So. 926 (Ray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray v. State, 84 So. 926, 17 Ala. App. 696 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of grand larceny, and was duly sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years. This appeal is upon the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and the clerk of the court under seal -of office certifies that the time for filing a bill of exceptions has expired and that no bill of exceptions has been filed. The proceedings as shown by the record are regular in all respects, and no error appears. It follows that the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of grand larceny, and was duly sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years. This appeal is upon the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and the clerk of the court under seal -of office certifies that the time for filing a bill of exceptions has expired and that no bill of exceptions has been filed. The proceedings as shown by the record are regular in all respects, and no error appears. It follows that the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 So. 926, 17 Ala. App. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-state-alactapp-1919.