Ray v. Southern Ry. Co.

77 S.E. 1012, 94 S.C. 303, 1913 S.C. LEXIS 143
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 8, 1913
Docket8514
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 77 S.E. 1012 (Ray v. Southern Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ray v. Southern Ry. Co., 77 S.E. 1012, 94 S.C. 303, 1913 S.C. LEXIS 143 (S.C. 1913).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods. The plaintiff filed a claim against the defendant railroad company for $4.65, the value of three pairs of shoes, lost in transit from St. Louis, Missouri, to Denmark, South Carolina, and thirty-six cents freight *304 thereon. Upon the failure of the carrier to pay the claim within forty days, the plaintiff brought this action in a magistrate’s court for $4.65 and the statutory penalty of $50.00, without including the item of thirty-six cents for freight. The defendant offered to allow judgment for $4.65, the value of the goods, but contended that the penalty could not be recovered, since the amount sued for was less than the amount of the claim filed. The Circuit Court affirmed the judgment of the magistrate for $4.65 and the statutory penalty.

We think this was clearly error. The statute provides as a condition of the recovery of the penalty that the plaintiff shall recover the full amount of his claim. As the plaintiff could not recover under this complaint the full amount of his claim, he could not recover the penalty. Price v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co., 93 S. C. 576.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson Motor Co. v. Payne, Director General
107 S.E. 252 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1921)
Palmetto Fertilizer Co. v. Columbia, N. & L. R. R.
83 S.E. 36 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1914)
Fertilizer Company v. Railroad Company
83 S.E. 36 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 1012, 94 S.C. 303, 1913 S.C. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-southern-ry-co-sc-1913.