Ray v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad

205 So. 2d 537
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 1967·No. No. J-88·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Gentry (Fla.1950), 46 So.2d 485; Holl v. Talcott (Fla.1966), 191 So.2d 40.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad, 205 So. 2d 537 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

205 So. 2d 537 (Ray v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Gentry
46 So. 2d 485 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
Holl v. Talcott
191 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)