Ray v. . Ross

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Ray v. . Ross

125 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 829, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 213

DecidedNovember 12, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 925 (Ray v. . Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray v. . Ross, 125 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 829, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 213 (N.C. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This was an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in the court below. From the evidence set out in the record, taken in a light most favorable to plaintiff, we think the case should have been submitted to a jury. The evidence excluded was competent.

¥e think the case is governed by the principle laid down in Taylor v. Lee, 187 N. C., p. 393.

For the reasons given, the judgment must be

Eeversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

This was an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in the court below. From the evidence set out in the record, taken in a light most favorable to plaintiff, we think the case should have been submitted to a jury. The evidence excluded was competent.

¥e think the case is governed by the principle laid down in Taylor v. Lee, 187 N. C., p. 393.

For the reasons given, the judgment must be

Eeversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 829, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-ross-nc-1924.