Ray v. Reed

680 F.3d 841, 2012 WL 1679804
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 14, 2012·No. 10-4593, 10-4619·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

THEODORE A. McKEE, Chief Judge.

These consolidated cases were heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Eastern of Pennsylvania and were argued on April 19, 2012. **

AND NOW in consideration of oral argument and briefs that were submitted, it is hereby ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the judgments of the District Court entered November 9, 2010, are hereby affirmed and, with the exception of the denial of the motion to consolidate, the Order issued by the Clerk of this Court on February 25, 2011, is hereby reinstated. Each Party to Pay Own Costs.

**

We note that the attorneys and students representing Appellant appeared pro bono. We thank them for taking these cases on a pro bono basis and for the very able and professional way in which they handled the representation and argument before the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Reed, 680 F.3d 841, 2012 WL 1679804 (3d Cir. 2012).

680 F.3d 841 (Ray v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Siluk, Jr. v. Catherine Merwin
783 F.3d 421 (Third Circuit, 2015)