Ray v. Ray

47 S.E. 570, 120 Ga. 25, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 434
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1904·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

While there was strong circumstantial evidence to the effect that subsequently to the separation of the parties the wife had been guilty of adultery, there was also evidence to contradict this contention ; and it can not be said that the court abused its discretion in awarding the plaintiff temporary alimony and attorney’s f,ees.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Ray, 47 S.E. 570, 120 Ga. 25, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 434 (Ga. 1904).

47 S.E. 570 (Ray v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNeil v. McNeil
112 S.E. 460 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)