Ray v. Ray
47 S.E. 570, 120 Ga. 25, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 434
This text of 47 S.E. 570 (Ray v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ray v. Ray, 47 S.E. 570, 120 Ga. 25, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 434 (Ga. 1904).
Opinion
While there was strong circumstantial evidence to the effect that subsequently to the separation of the parties the wife had been guilty of adultery, there was also evidence to contradict this contention ; and it can not be said that the court abused its discretion in awarding the plaintiff temporary alimony and attorney’s f,ees.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McNeil v. McNeil
112 S.E. 460 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 S.E. 570, 120 Ga. 25, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-ray-ga-1904.