Ray v. Ohio
364 U.S. 476, 5 L. Ed. 2d 222, 81 S. Ct. 244, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 83
This text of 364 U.S. 476 (Ray v. Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ray v. Ohio, 364 U.S. 476, 5 L. Ed. 2d 222, 81 S. Ct. 244, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 83 (1960).
Opinion
The motion for leave to supplement the jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
364 U.S. 476, 5 L. Ed. 2d 222, 81 S. Ct. 244, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-ohio-scotus-1960.